Home

Sat, Nov. 3rd, 2007, 12:17 pm
723: Barnett's The Pentagon's New Map

The Pentagon’s New Map: War and Peace in the 21st Century
Thomas P.M. Barnett

I was dialing around cable at my parent’s house one day a couple of years ago and ran across the most incredible power point presentation being given by a dude from the Naval War College on CSPAN about how the U.S. should think about security threats in the future. Basically his point was that those alienated from global capitalism are those we need to be most worried about and that places like Central Africa will soon join Afghanistan as geographical locations from which threats will arise. That presentation became this book and it is seriously worth reading. Barnett makes his living predicting bad shit for the U.S. government (and now, I believe, also for big corporations) and he is very good at what he does. Obviously sites of threats to the U.S. are also sites for new modes of positive resistance (those these things are not interchangeable) and also sights for economic development, so this book struck really close to a lot of my interests.

Barnett also has a number of other predictions which may be hogwash, but may also lead to something really interesting. For instance, he toys with the idea that NAFTA will lead to a more EU style unification and the that the EU will soon be much more of a cohesive state. Interesting ideas and an interesting book. It’s a couple of years old now, but still worth picking up.

Sat, Nov. 3rd, 2007 07:14 pm (UTC)
[info]bing_crosby

re (sort of) the last bit-- I heard some pundit on npr recently talking about how we should expect the US borders to expand in our lifetimes, like possibly incorporating mexico. sounds crazy, but so have a lot of things that came to pass.

Sat, Nov. 3rd, 2007 07:17 pm (UTC)
[info]atthesametime

it makes a ton of sense economically, though it is hard to imagine with the insane racist rhetoric you hear coming out about Mexicans.

Sat, Nov. 3rd, 2007 07:21 pm (UTC)
[info]bing_crosby: I'm too much of a historian

note that we have taken up part of mexico before, when we were (arguably) way more racist. but yeah.

Sat, Nov. 3rd, 2007 11:03 pm (UTC)
[info]rfmcdpei

His books have struck me as being a bit American-nationalist--his predictions that "parts" of Mexico might become part of the American state, for instance. That said, his wider talk about a broader and tighter North America does make sense and is probably happening.

Sat, Nov. 3rd, 2007 11:30 pm (UTC)
[info]atthesametime

His books have struck me as being a bit American-nationalist

Oh absolutely, I do not share his politics, but some of what he says is pretty smart. Did you read the follow up to this? I can't remember now what it was called...